CrossRef enabled

PAC Archives

Archive →

Pure Appl. Chem., 2013, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 851-881

http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-12-11-18

Published online 2013-02-16

Impact of scientific developments on the Chemical Weapons Convention (IUPAC Technical Report)

Katie Smallwood1, Ralf Trapp2, Robert Mathews3, Beat Schmidt4 and Leiv K. Sydnes5*

1 Independent Consultant, Geneva, Switzerland
2 International Disarmament Consultant, 74270 Chessenaz, France
3 Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Australia
4 Spiez Laboratory, 3700 Spiez, Switzerland
5 Department of Chemistry, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway

References

  • 1. G. W. Parshall, G. S. Pearson, T. D. Inch, E. D. Becker. Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 2323 (2002). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200274122323)
  • 2. M. Balali-Mood, P. S. Steyn, L. K. Sydnes, R. Trapp. Pure Appl. Chem. 80, 175 (2008). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200880010175)
  • 3. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction. Available online at http://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/ (accessed 8 February 2013).
  • 4. S. Mogl (Ed.). Technical Workshop on Incapacitating Chemical Agents; Spiez, Switzerland, 8–9 September 2011, Spiez Laboratory, Federal Department of Defence, Civil Protection and Sports DDPS, Federal Office for Civil Protection FOCP (2012). Available at: http://www.labor-spiez.ch/de/dok/hi/pdf/web_e_ICA_Konferenzbericht.pdf.
  • 5. R. Ekéus (Chair). Report of the Advisory Panel on Future Priorities of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, S/951/2011, Office of the Director-General, OPCW (2011). Available at: http://www.opcw.org/file/file/report_of_the_advisory_panel_on_future_priorities_ of_the_organisation_for_the_prohibition_of_chemica/.
  • 6. G. S. Pearson, P. Mahaffy. Pure Appl. Chem. 78, 2169 (2006). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200678112169)