CrossRef enabled

PAC Archives

Archive →

Pure Appl. Chem., 2008, Vol. 80, No. 8, pp. 1763-1772

http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200880081763

The duality of chemistry: Chemistry for peaceful purposes versus chemical weapons

Ralf Trapp

Rte des Closets, 74270 Chessenaz, France

References

  • 1. United Nations. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction, <http://www.opcw.org/docs/cwc_eng.pdf>.
  • 2. M. Balali-Mood, P. S. Steyn, L. K. Sydnes, R. Trapp. Pure Appl. Chem. 80, 118 (2008). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200880010175)
  • 3. G. W. Parshall, G. S. Pearson, T. D. Inch, E. D. Becker. Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 2323 (2002). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200274122323)
  • 4. British Medical Association. The Use of Drugs as Weapons: The Concerns and Responsibilities of Healthcare Professionals (2007).
  • 5. <http://www.opcw.org/docs/rc1dg02.pdf>.
  • 6. <http://www.opcw.org/docs/rc105.pdf>.
  • 7. Unpublished findings.
  • 8. International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA). Statement on Consistency between the Chemical Weapons Convention and Responsible Care(R) Implementation, September 2003, <http://www.opcw.org/cdq/html/cdq4/cdq4_art10.html>.
  • 9. M. Kelliher. Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 2277 (2002). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200274122277)
  • 10. G. S. Pearson, P. Mahaffy. Pure Appl. Chem. 78, 2169 (2006). (http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200678112169)
  • 11. <www.iupac.org/multiple-uses-of-chemicals>.