CrossRef enabled

PAC Archives

Archive →

Pure Appl. Chem., 2003, Vol. 75, No. 11-12, pp. 2151-2158

http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200375112151

Use of NOAEL, benchmark dose, and other models for human risk assessment of hormonally active substances

R. W. Setzer, Jr. and C. A. Kimmel

USEPA, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Experimental Toxicology Division, Pharmacokinetics Branch, MD B143-01 109 TW Alexander Drive,Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA;

USEPA Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment (8623D), Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460, USA

Abstract: The benchmark dose (BMD) is the dose of a substance that is expected to result in a prespecified level of effect, the benchmark response level or BMR. It is a general approach to characterizing dose response, applicable to any toxicant and endpoint. A BMD is conceptually superior to a "no observed adverse effect level" (NOAEL) for this purpose because of being less determined by experimental design, because it is a precisely defined entity, and because its precision can be estimated. Since a BMD is a single number, just as an NOAEL, it is tempting to use the BMD as a straightforward replacement for the NOAEL in the assessment process for calculating allowable daily intakes. However, the level of toxic response at a NOAEL is unknown, while that at a BMD is well defined. Use of the BMD approach potentially adds consistency and objectivity to the process of deriving reference values (RfDs, RfCs, or ADIs) for setting regulatory levels. To take advantage of this, BMRs need to be selected in a consistent way across studies and endpoints. This paper discusses some issues affecting the selection of BMRs, and presents an example of a BMD calculated for the effects of peripubertal exposure to the fungicide vinclozolin.