CrossRef enabled

PAC Archives

Archive →

Pure Appl. Chem., 2001, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 993-1031

http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac200173060993

CHEMISTRY AND HUMAN HEALTH DIVISION
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY SECTION
COMMISSION ON TOXICOLOGY

Risk assessment for occupational exposure to chemicals. A review of current methodology (IUPAC Technical Report)

Robert F. M. Herber1, John H. Duffus2*, Jytte Molin Christensen3, Erik Olsen3 and Milton V. Park2

1 Coronel Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22700, NL1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 The Edinburgh Centre for Toxicology, 43 Mansionhouse Road, Edinburgh EH9 2JD, United Kingdom
3 National Institute of Occupational Health, Lerso Parkalle 105, DK-2 100, Copenhagen, Denmark

CrossRef Cited-by theme picture

CrossRef Cited-by Linking

  • Gentry P. Robinan, House-Knight Tamara, Harris Angela, Greene Tracy, Campleman Sharan: Potential occupational risk of amines in carbon capture for power generation. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0900-y>
  • Taweel Abdulali, Shuhaimi-Othman Mohammad, Ahmad Abas Kutty: Evaluation of copper, lead and arsenic level in tilapia fish in Cempaka Lake (Bangi, Malaysia) and human daily/weekly intake. Biologia 2013, 68, 983. <http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11756-013-0241-z>
  • Pizzol M., Christensen P., Schmidt J., Thomsen M.: Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA). J  Clean Prod 2011, 19, 646. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.05.007>
  • Demou Evangelia, Hellweg Stefanie, Hungerbühler Konrad: An occupational chemical priority list for future life cycle assessments. J  Clean Prod 2011, 19, 1339. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.011>