Pure and Applied Chemistry

CrossRef Cited-by Linking

• Hauck Walter W.: Primary and Secondary Reference Materials for Procedures to Test the Quality of Medicines and Foods. PHARMA RES 2012, 29, 922. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11095-012-0687-7>
• Bonfilio Rudy, Cazedey Edith Cristina Laignier, Araújo Magali Benjamim de, Nunes Salgado Hérida Regina: Analytical Validation of Quantitative High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Methods in Pharmaceutical Analysis: A Practical Approach. Crit Rev Anal Chem 2012, 42, 87. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2012.630926>
• HORWITZ W.: ChemInform Abstract: Nomenclature of Interlaboratory Analytical Studies. ChemInform 2010, 25, no. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chin.199451320>
• Fisicaro P., Champion R., Labarraque G., Lalere B., Mace T., Sutour C.: Strategies implemented at LNE to establish the traceability of environmental measurements. Accred Qual Assur 2008, 13, 367. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-008-0394-6>
• Greaves M., Caillon N., Rebaubier H., Bartoli G., Bohaty S., Cacho I., Clarke L., Cooper M., Daunt C., Delaney M., deMenocal P., Dutton A., Eggins S., Elderfield H., Garbe-Schoenberg D., Goddard E., Green D., Groeneveld J., Hastings D., Hathorne E., Kimoto K., Klinkhammer G., Labeyrie L., Lea D. W., Marchitto T., Martínez-Botí M. A., Mortyn P. G., Ni Y., Nuernberg D., Paradis G., Pena L., Quinn T., Rosenthal Y., Russell A., Sagawa T., Sosdian S., Stott L., Tachikawa K., Tappa E., Thunell R., Wilson P. A.: Interlaboratory comparison study of calibration standards for foraminiferal Mg/Ca thermometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2008, 9, n/a. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GC001974>
• Prieto M. Alvarez, Chacón J. Jiménez, Nodarse I. Cortés, Alfonso N. Martínez: Some Latin American experiences concerning teaching of chemical metrology. Accred Qual Assur 2007, 12, 39. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-006-0222-9>
• Vial J., Jardy A.: Interlaboratory studies: the best way to estimate the characteristics of dispersion of an HPLC method and a powerful tool for analytical transfers. Chroma 2001, 53, S141. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02490320>
• Cofino Wim P, van Stokkum Ivo H.M, Wells David E, Ariese Freek, Wegener Jan-Willem M, Peerboom Reneé A.L: A new model for the inference of population characteristics from experimental data using uncertainties. Application to interlaboratory studies. CHEM INTELL 2000, 53, 37. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(00)00093-9>
• Currie Lloyd A.: Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities. Analytica Chimica Acta 1999, 391, 105. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00104-X>
• van der Voet Hilko, (Hans) van Rhijn J.A, van de Wiel Henk J: Inter-laboratory, time, and fitness-for-purpose aspects of effective validation. Analytica Chimica Acta 1999, 391, 159. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00109-9>
• van Zoonen Piet, Hoogerbrugge Ronald, Gort Steven M, van de Wiel Henk J, van 't Klooster Henk A: Some practical examples of method validation in the analytical laboratory. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 1999, 18, 584. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-9936(99)00159-4>
• de Ruig W.G.: Characterizing and optimizing analytical method quality. Trends Food Sci Techn 1996, 7, 234. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-2244(96)20004-4>
• Minkkinen Pentti: Estimation of variance components from the results of interlaboratory comparisons. CHEM INTELL 1995, 29, 263. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(95)80101-E>